An IRS settlement officer (SO) properly upheld a trust fund recovery penalty assessed against an individual. Form 4183, Recommendation re: Trust Fund Recovery Penalty Assessment, sufficiently verified the supervisor’s written penalty approval.
Written Penalty Approval
First, the individual argued that the IRS submitted a defective penalty approval form. The Form 4183, submitted by the IRS contained only a printed name in the supervisor’s signature block. Therefore, it did not contain the supervisor’s “signature.” Then, the individual claimed that the SO was required to determine if the supervisor’s penalty approval was “meaningful.” However, the IRS responded that the supervisor’s printed name on the form complied with the statute’s “signature” requirement.
Verifying Administrative Steps
During a Collection Due Process hearing, an SO properly verifies assessments when the administrative record reflects compliance with administrative procedures. Generally, a Form 4340, Certificate of Assessments and Payments, proves that an assessment officer executed and certified a Summary Record of Assessment. Moreover, the SO did not abuse his discretion when he relied on Form 4340. The taxpayer failed to show any irregularity in the assessment procedure that raised a question about the assessment’s validity. Additionally, an SO may rely on a computer printout of the taxpayer’s transcript of account to verify the taxpayer’s tax liability and the assessment of tax.
Actual Signature Not Required
Similarly, Form 4183 provides a mechanism to demonstrate supervisory approval. Clearly, the Form 4183 did not have an actual written signature. However, the form did show that the revenue officer’s immediate supervisor approved assessing the trust fund recovery penalty. Accordingly, a record of the required prior approval was present whether or not such approval was required before the TFRP assessment.
S.T. Blackburn, Dec. 61,154