5 Common Audit Deficiencies and How to Prevent Them

Audit quality is a hot topic, with increased attention from the government and the AICPA. For many firms, the status quo will no longer be an adequate approach to audits. In a whitepaper published late last year, Wolters Kluwer audit experts Robin Penney and Stephanie Lanke wrote about common audit deficiencies and how to prevent them.

The whitepaper outlines 5 common deficiencies that firms face:

  • Inadequate internal controls assessments
  • Failure to link risk assessments to audit procedures
  • Failure to identify or implement new standards
  • Not understanding specialized industry and reporting situations
  • Inadequate tailoring of a firm’s quality control system

Since there is no substitute for professional judgement, auditors must avoid a “checklist mentality.” Many practice aids can result in over- or under-auditing. Instead, a quality audit methodology should help auditors collect information and build knowledge so they can design the appropriate audit steps based on what they know about a particular client.

To learn more about addressing common auditing efficiencies, download the whitepaper: “Common Auditing Deficiencies Found in Peer Review.”

AUTHOR

Aimee Hall

Product Marketing Manager at Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting

All stories by: Aimee Hall

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.