Tax Court Properly Determined Innocent Spouse Relief De Novo (Wilson, CA-9)

The Tax Court properly considered new evidence and proceeded de novo to determine that an individual was eligible for equitable innocent spouse relief. The Tax Court was not limited to the IRS’s administrative record because a determination of whether innocent spouse relief is appropriate under Code Sec. 6015(f) requires consideration of all the facts and circumstances relevant to the individual’s petition. Such consideration is not possible if the Tax Court can review only the evidence available to the IRS. Therefore, determining the validity of an individual’s request for innocent spouse relief required a de novo scope of evidentiary review. Moreover, confining the Tax Court’s review to the administrative record would introduce significant inconsistencies in the standards of review for different types of innocent spouse cases.

 

Further, the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) did not apply to restrict the Tax Court’s review of requests for innocent spouse relief to abuse of discretion. The APA did not apply because Congress provided a special statutory review process for innocent spouse relief requests under Code Sec. 6015(e) . In addition, the IRS’s procedures for handling innocent spouse relief requests supported the conclusion that the APA did not apply. The IRS’s procedures do not allow an individual to conduct discovery, present live testimony under oath, subpoena witnesses for trial, conduct cross-examination or present his or her case to an administrative law judge. Indeed, an individual’s only opportunity to present an innocent spouse case to the IRS is through telephonic interviews with an agent in a remote location. Moreover, even if the APA applied, exceptions to the general rules would permit the Tax Court to consider additional evidence critical to determining whether the IRS considered all relevant factors in denying equitable innocent spouse relief.

 

The government’s argument that the appropriate standard for review was contained in Code Sec. 6015(f) not Code Sec. 6015(e) was rejected. Code Sec. 6015(f) addresses only the IRS’s role in considering petitions for equitable relief. The Tax Court’s role in reviewing requests for relief is dictated solely by Code Sec. 6015(e) , which explicitly calls for a determination by the Tax Court. A jurisdictional grant to the Tax Court to determine whether equitable innocent spouse relief is appropriate strongly indicates that the Tax Court should proceed de novo in considering such claims.

 

Neal , CA-11 2009-1 ustc ¶50,216 , followed

 

Affirming the Tax Court, 99 TCM 155, Dec. 58,248(M) , TC Memo. 2010-134.

 

K.M. Wilson, CA-9, 2013-1 ustc ¶50,147

 

Other References:

 

Code Sec. 6015

 

CCH Reference – 2013FED ¶35,192.25

 

CCH Reference – 2013FED ¶35,192.815

 

Tax Research Consultant

 

CCH Reference – TRC INDIV: 18,052.20

CCH Reference – TRC INDIV: 18,058

 

AUTHOR

Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting

Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting is a leading provider of software solutions and local expertise that helps tax, accounting, and audit professionals research and navigate complex regulations, comply with legislation, manage their businesses and advise clients with speed, accuracy and efficiency. Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting is part of Wolters Kluwer N.V. (AEX: WKL), a global leader in information services and solutions for professionals in the health, tax and accounting, risk and compliance, finance and legal sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with specialized technology and services. Wolters Kluwer reported 2016 annual revenues of €4.3 billion. The company, headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands, serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries and employs 19,000 people worldwide. Wolters Kluwer shares are listed on Euronext Amsterdam (WKL) and are included in the AEX and Euronext 100 indices. Wolters Kluwer has a sponsored Level 1 American Depositary Receipt program. The ADRs are traded on the over-the-counter market in the U.S. (WTKWY).

All stories by: Wolters Kluwer Tax and Accounting